TL;DR
Since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, Britain’s public sector has seen a significant rise in AI-generated requests and complaints. This surge is straining bureaucratic processes and raising questions about future policy responses.
Since November 2022, the British government and public agencies have experienced a sharp increase in AI-generated requests and complaints, according to new data analyzed by Sky News. This surge is impacting workload, causing friction within bureaucratic systems, and prompting discussions on policy responses to AI’s influence on administrative processes.
The data, sourced from Sky News and analyzed by technology correspondent Rowland Manthorpe, shows that across multiple channels—such as water company complaints, local authority inquiries, and healthcare requests—the volume of AI-influenced paperwork has grown exponentially since ChatGPT’s release. For example, complaints about water companies increased by 144%, and local authority complaints rose by 78% in this period.
In a small test, Sky News found that 89% of recent FOI requests analyzed by AI detection software appeared to be fully AI-generated, compared to 0% from samples in 2019, though experts caution that detection tools are imperfect and causality is not confirmed. Similar trends are observed internationally, with reports of complaint surges in the US and other jurisdictions, indicating a broader pattern of AI-driven administrative activity.
According to a survey of civil servants, 58% say AI-generated public content significantly affects their work, describing it as overwhelming and sometimes frustrating. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued guidance affirming that AI-written FOI requests are valid, but authorities face increasing complexity and volume, complicating response efforts.
Britain’s Bureaucracy Has More AI Paperwork To Handle—and Friction Won’t Stop It
Since ChatGPT launched in November 2022, public agencies have faced a growing wave of AI-influenced requests and complaints. The rise is testing capacity, policy and the everyday relationship between citizens and the state.
“A long flat line, then a slow rise from late 2022, then acceleration across almost every channel.”
Rowland Manthorpe · Sky NewsMore correspondence is landing across public services
Complaints and inquiries have risen in several channels. The figures show a broad workload shift; they do not prove that AI alone caused it.
Water companies
Complaints increased 144% over the period described, adding to pressure on teams handling customer disputes.
Local authorities
Complaints rose 78%, while councils continue to process a wide mix of public requests and casework.
Housing redress
The UK Housing Ombudsman received about 2,600 complaints in 2022, rising to more than 7,000 last year.
A sharp rise, with important limits on what the data can say
Sky News analyzed trends across multiple routes into government and public agencies. A small detection test offers a signal, not a definitive count of AI use.
Reported change in complaints
Bars are scaled for visual comparison within this graphic. Housing Ombudsman figures compare approximately 2,600 complaints in 2022 with more than 7,000 last year.
FOI request detection test
AI detection software flagged recent requests as fully AI-generated. The sample was small, detection tools can be wrong, and the result cannot establish cause or represent every request.
More volume meets systems built for a slower pace
AI can help people draft clear requests. But higher volume and increasingly polished correspondence can make triage, clarification and timely responses harder.
Writing tools become widely available
Requests and complaints arrive at scale
Staff must sort, verify and respond
Delays and frustration become risks
On the front line: 58% of surveyed civil servants say AI-generated public content significantly affects their work. One described feeling “bombarded with correspondence at speed.”
More paperwork can mean more friction—without proving every case is AI-driven.
Valid requests still need workable processes
The central policy task is to protect access to public information while helping agencies manage volume fairly and consistently.
| Issue | What is known | What remains uncertain | Practical pressure |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI involvement | More AI-influenced submissions are reported | Detection is imperfect; attribution is difficult | Staff cannot reliably infer intent from polished wording |
| FOI requests | ICO guidance says AI-written requests are valid | How volumes will develop is not yet clear | Agencies may need clarification and better triage |
| Service impact | Multiple channels show rising complaints | Long-term effects on trust and quality are unknown | Overload can contribute to delays, errors and dissatisfaction |
| Policy response | Monitoring and guidance are underway | Best safeguards are still being assessed | Rules must balance public access and operational capacity |
The picture spans agencies, researchers and staff
International reporting points to a wider pattern. One research effort identified 84 cases across 11 jurisdictions where requests or complaints surged after 2022.
“It honestly feels in some instances we’re arguing with ChatGPT.”
Civil servant · quoted by Sky News“The vast majority of cases we find are people who are entitled to claim for something, claiming for that thing.”
Chris Schmitz · researcherAI may streamline administration if agencies have the right safeguards and capacity to adapt.
Policy outlook · unresolvedImplications of AI-Driven Bureaucratic Overload
This surge in AI-generated paperwork could fundamentally alter how government agencies operate, potentially increasing efficiency but also risking overload and increased friction within public services. The rising volume challenges existing resources and processes, forcing authorities to reconsider how they handle public inquiries and complaints.
While some argue AI could streamline administrative tasks, the current trend suggests that without policy adjustments, the system may become overwhelmed, leading to delays, errors, and public dissatisfaction. The situation underscores the need for updated guidelines and technological safeguards to manage AI’s role in bureaucracy effectively.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Prior to 2022, the volume of FOI requests and complaints in Britain was relatively stable. The launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 marked a turning point, with data showing a steep increase in AI-influenced submissions. Similar patterns are observed internationally, with reports from the US and other countries indicating a comparable rise in complaint volumes, often attributed to AI-generated content.
Research by Chris Schmitz identified 84 cases across 11 jurisdictions where complaints and requests have surged since 2022, with many cases showing flat trends before this period. The UK Housing Ombudsman reported complaints rising from about 2,600 in 2022 to over 7,000 last year, illustrating the scale of the trend. The UK ICO has acknowledged this shift and issued guidance on AI-written requests, but operational challenges persist.
“The pattern is clear: a long flat line, then a slow rise from late 2022, then acceleration across almost every channel where citizens write to the British state.”
— Rowland Manthorpe, Sky News
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Uncertainties About AI’s Long-Term Impact
It remains unclear how much of the recent surge is directly caused by AI, given the limitations of detection tools and the complexity of human behavior. The precise future trajectory of AI’s influence on bureaucratic workload and the potential for policy intervention are still developing areas of understanding. Additionally, the long-term effects on public trust and service quality are not yet known.
bureaucracy workflow automation tools
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Policy Responses and Technological Safeguards
Authorities are expected to consider new policies to manage AI-generated requests, including stricter guidelines, improved detection methods, and possible restrictions on AI use in public inquiries. Monitoring trends over the coming months will be crucial to assess whether these measures can mitigate the overload and friction within the system. Further research and stakeholder engagement are likely to shape future responses.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What caused the recent surge in AI-generated paperwork in Britain?
The launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 significantly increased the volume of AI-influenced requests and complaints, as AI tools became more accessible and widely used by the public to communicate with government agencies.
Are all the recent requests AI-generated?
Most recent analyses suggest a high proportion of AI involvement, but detection tools are not fully reliable. While many requests are likely AI-influenced, definitive attribution remains challenging.
How is the British government responding to this increase?
The UK’s ICO has issued guidance affirming the validity of AI-written requests and advising agencies to ask for clarification when needed. Discussions about policy adjustments and technological safeguards are ongoing.
What are the risks of this trend for public services?
The primary risks include operational overload, delays in response times, increased errors, and diminished public trust if agencies cannot keep pace with the rising volume of paperwork influenced by AI.
Could AI eventually improve bureaucratic efficiency?
Potentially, yes. If managed properly with appropriate policies and safeguards, AI could streamline processing and reduce workload. However, current trends indicate that without intervention, overload and friction are likely to increase.
Source: Thorsten Meyer AI
